Search for: "MATTER OF J R T"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2013, 11:01 am
None of the appeals was successful.Enlarged Board decisions (pursuant to A 112)There was only one decision: G 1/10 dealing with corrections under R 140.Legal Board of AppealThere were 11 decisions in 2012, dealing with a great variety of legal questions.Re-establishment (J 5/11, J 6/11, J 13/11, J 16/11)Admissibility of an appeal (J 9/11, J 10/11)Stay of proceedings (J 6/10, J 7/10)Refund of the examination fee… [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In its decision J 9/84 [4] the Legal Board of appeal explained that the main purpose of R 31 EPC [1973] was “to induce the applicant to limit the protection sought to a certain number of claims, in the first instance for the purposes of the European search”. [read post]
24 Jul 2010, 11:00 am
However, decision J 27/96 is concerned with R 88 EPC 1973 (R 139 EPC 2000), which applies to corrections of errors in documents filed before the EPO, whereas the [opponent] is objecting to a decision concerning a correction under R 140 EPC 2000 (R 89 EPC 1973), which applies to decisions of deciding bodies of the EPO. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:16 am
Furthermore, Fish, J. referred to of R. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
However, the fact that the Board has come to a different conclusion from the department of first instance does not by itself mean that the latter committed a substantial procedural violation (see for example decisions T 87/88; T 538/89, T 182/92) but is rather a matter of judgment, which does not amount to a procedural violation (see for example decision T 182/92 [7] and Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 7th edition 2013,… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See G 2/92 [2], J 3/09 [3.5.2] and T 2495/11 [2.1-2]. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
J 10/07, T 1366/04, T 1279/05). [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
It is also the applicant who receives the EPO communications regarding the European patent application (see for example R 55, 56(1), first sentence, and (2), second sentence, R 58, R 60, R 65, R 69(1), R 70(2) and A 94(3) together with R 71). [9] The provisions of the EPC foresee a few exceptional situations where, apart from the applicant, a person other than the applicant (so-called “third party”) is involved as a party in… [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:11 am
Here’s a handy list of codes: 1 Early distribution, no known exception 2 Early distribution, exception applies 3 Disability 4 Death 5 Prohibited transaction 6 Section 1035 exchange 7 Normal distribution 8 Excess contribution 9 Cost of life insurance protection A May be eligible for 10-year tax option D Excess contribution E Excess annual additions F Charitable gift annuity G Direct rollover J Early distribution from Roth IRA L Loans treated as deemed distributions N… [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 6:07 am
I don’t think J&J is doing all they can for patient safety. [read post]
7 May 2008, 11:01 am
Collaborative Family Lawyer and Mediator J. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am
In other words, the reimbursement of a fee requires there to be special provision (see for example decision J 33/86). [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 5:00 am
Aug. 23, 2019 Doyle, J.), the court sustained certain Preliminary Objections filed by a Plaintiff to New Matter defenses asserted by a Defendant in a case arising out of a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
J 15/04 [13]). [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 4:56 am
In the Matter of Michael J. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
T 220/83 [4] and T 177/97 [1]; affirmed by numerous decisions, and in particular recently by T 573/09 [1.1]).Whether the requirements of A 108, third sentence, in conjunction with R 99(2) are met has to be decided on the basis of the statement of grounds of appeal and of the reasons given in the contested decision (see, e.g., J 22/86 [2]; T 162/97 [1.1.2]).Exceptionally, it has been acknowledged that “the requirement for admissibility [laid… [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
R. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:38 am
FRANK J. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Ben R. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Ben R. [read post]
