Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers" Results 21 - 40 of 21,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm by Kevin Russell
Perhaps his most prominent discussion of separation of powers comes in a 2016 concurrence in Gutierrez-Brizuela v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm by INFORRM
On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2019] UKSC 22), deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) that purports to exclude from challenge or appeal any decision of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (“IPT”), does not… [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:23 am
The court’s fact-review power of an administrative agency's determination is limited to whether substantial evidence supports the determination Matter of Jenkins v Israel, 2011 NY Slip Op 03604, Appellate Division, Second Department The Westchester Medical Center filed disciplinary charges against Lisa Jenkins alleging insubordination and misconduct pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
But here’s the thing: it does not matter whether you are Republican, Democrat, or Independent. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
But here’s the thing: it does not matter whether you are Republican, Democrat, or Independent. [read post]
7 May 2019, 8:30 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice Willis Van Devanter made perhaps the most famous statement of these powers in McGrain v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:18 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The lower court decision at issue was set aside March 1 by the Supreme Court (Kiyemba v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm by Graham Smith
 Limits on powers v safeguards The Act is underpinned by the assumption that breadth of powers can be counterbalanced by safeguards (independent prior approval, access restrictions, oversight) and soft limits on their exercise (necessity and proportionality). [read post]