Search for: "MATTER OF R A D J D" Results 21 - 40 of 2,938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2024, 1:49 pm by Michael Oykhman
” In R v D(J) the court states that for the charge to be made out, the breach of peace must “flow from the manner in which possession of the real property is taken and not from subsequent events. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Dwyer, a young, earnest immunologist who had done some contract work on an unrelated matter for Bristol-Myers Squibb, a defendant in the litigation. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released a Proposed Statement of Policy on Bank Merger Transactions (the Proposal) that outlines the FDIC’s views on its jurisdiction and expectations with respect to each statutory factor under the Bank Merger Act (BMA). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 7:53 pm by Béligh Elbalti
Since the enactment of the Tunisian Private International Law Code (“PILC”) in 1998 (for an English translation, see J. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
You could, for instance, turn your gaze on the court itself, and give it one long, hard stare.Sutherland was celebrating--and, sadly, wildly overstating--changes he’d had a real hand in, as had his wife, Rosamond Lee Sutherland. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
As a general matter, dealers are expected to act in their own interest, free to buy and sell on their own account, often on behalf of artists, collectors or galleries.[8] Agents, however, act on behalf of the person they are representing—their principal. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Contrary to industry claims that high drug prices are necessary to fund research and development (R&D), drug prices often depend more on whether the drug faces competition than the drug’s R&D costs. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
D’Amico, 2019 SCC 23, [2019] 2 S.C.R. 394, at para. 3. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
If adopted in its current form, the proposed treaty would increase the risk that good faith security researchers could face prosecution, even when our goal is to enhance technological safety and educate the public on cybersecurity matters. [read post]