Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 21 - 40
of 53,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2021, 2:57 am
Gonzales and R. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
In T 1981/12 [catchword, point 1] the Board considered, in somewhat similar circumstances, that the correct basis for the refusal of the application was that the applicant was not entitled to pursue an application based on subject matter not searched by the EPO. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:32 am
Background Last week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 35. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:45 pm
So says Barry: Spelling don’t matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
R 137(4) in the version that was in force from December 13, 2007, to March 31, 2010 (hereinafter referred to as R 137(4), version of before April 1, 2010) has to be applied.[2.2.2] R 137(4), version of before April 1, 2010, provides that amended claims may not relate to unsearched subject-matter which does not combine with the originally claimed invention or group of inventions to form a single general inventive concept. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
” (emphasis added by the board).[2.2.4] It follows from this that the appeal proceedings are confined to the subject-matter of the first instance proceedings and therefore that the statement of grounds of appeal should at least discuss this subject-matter. [read post]
29 May 2011, 8:33 pm
Second, repeat after me: “My 1L grades don’t matter. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:39 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – DEPENDENT NEGLECT DA 15-0491, 2016 MT 40N, IN THE MATTER OF: M.A.W., M.L.W., and K.R.T., Youths in Need of Care. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 12:08 pm
Charlotte Personal Injury Attorney Matthew R. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 9:07 am
That case actually stands for the fact that an IJ can't relinquish his/her duty to decide a motion (or case!) [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:23 am
Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) hasn’t gotten a lot of help from his GOP colleagues in defending against scurrilous attacks on his Medicare reform plan. [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
In decision T 1242/04 [8.3] the Board has explained that R 45 relates only to the practicability of a search and not to the potential relevance of its results in subsequent substantive examination. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 9:12 pm
I had the pleasure of presenting with Maura R. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:21 am
I sure as hell wouldn't hire Elizabeth R. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Prokop, who in 2008 was working for Kennametal Technologies and involved in matters relating to inventions in the Kennametal group. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 1:18 pm
Link: Rocket Matter - The web generation of legal software - Blog. [read post]
20 May 2008, 6:06 pm
All that matters is who gets the king at the end. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 1:25 am
Particularly, if the description is amended pre-grant in order to avoid inconsistencies in the patent specification, the deleted subject-matter cannot be reinserted into the description or claims post-grant (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II-E-2.3.2) (T 1149/97, r.2.6, T 684/02). [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, the fax shows that the page containing the notice of appeal in Italian was received at 18:26:21 whereas the Italian version was received at 18:26:37, i.e. 16 seconds later.The Board won’t have it:[1.2] The opponent (appellant 1) considered that the requirements of R 6(3) concerning the reduction of the appeal fee were not met, that the paid amount was not correct and that therefore, the appeal lodged by the patentee was to be rejected as… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
It therefore provides the means to stop applicants, in reply to the first communication, dropping existing claims, replacing them by switching to unsearched and non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description, i.e., claiming different subject-matter in sequence rather than simultaneously (T 274/03 [4], T 915/03 [3], T 1285/11 [2]). [read post]
