Search for: "MATTER OF R.M."
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2020, 4:25 am
Like the claim for reimbursement of plaintiff’s payment to DOT, this claim is not subject to CPLR 214 (6), as it does not allege negligence in performing professional obligations and thus is not “essentially a malpractice claim” (Matter of R.M. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 5:45 pm
In re R.M. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 4:34 am
., 12 NY3d 132, 139 [2009]; Matter of R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541 [2004]). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 6:15 am
., and R.M. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 1:28 am
A distinction in the rule of public policy between a matter governed by the domestic law and a matter involving conflict of laws has been noticed in Renusagar3. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
Brewer’s house and R.M. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:15 am
On the other hand, in R.M. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 5:24 am
In a related matter, the Muncie Star-Press has this story today by Seth Slabaugh, headed "Pork producer negotiating plea deal. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 9:06 am
Robert R.M. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 9:04 pm
Jimenez, R.M. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
”‘ In re R.M Kliment & Frances Hals band, Architects (McKinsey & Co., Inc.), 3 N.Y.3d 538, 541-542 (2004) (citation omitted). [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Thommen and R.M. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Thommen and R.M. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
On those other days, it can feel as if all that really matters is if the idea is expressed, or re-expressed, by an elite scholar at a school that “matters” among academics. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Family Court The purpose of a forensic evaluation is not to evaluate the child=s mental health In R.M. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 11:16 am
Hindustan Construction Company Limited, (2010) 4 SCC 518, a two Judge Bench of this Court speaking through one of us (R.M. [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 6:08 am
In assessing whether a claim is subject to the three-year statute of limitations contained in CPLR 214(6), “the pertinent inquiry is … whether the claim is essentially a malpractice claim” (In re R.M Kliment & Frances Halsband, Architects, 3 NY3d 538, 541-42 [2004]). [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 1:17 pm
This matter concerns date on which the transfer penalty should start for Petitioners. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 4:37 am
According to these affidavits, Wildmon told one of Bell's classmates, R.M. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:06 am
In R.M Malkani vs. [read post]
