Search for: "MATTER OF SIMON v. Power"
Results 21 - 40
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Simon and Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:08 am
Lee v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:26 am
In Lee v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The decision by Justice O’Donnell in R. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Ultimately, each side’s spin of judicial votes matters little: the only votes that matter are the nine on the Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 8:34 am
The Ninth Circuit gutted the red flag doctrine in Perfect 10 v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 9:07 am
Foreign Direct Investment, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, and Individual Corruption Experiences in Africa Christopher Heurlin, Authoritarian Aid and Regime Durability: Soviet Aid to the Developing World and Donor–Recipient Institutional Complementarity and Capacity Simone Dietrich, Helen V Milner, & Jonathan B Slapin, From Text to Political Positions on Foreign Aid: Analysis of Aid Mentions in Party Manifestos from 1960 to 2015 Laura Seelkopf & Ida Bastiaens,… [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
No matter its political power, an execution system without principle cannot long survive in a government committed to the rule of law. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am
That “spill over” concern is not just a matter of perceptions. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
In a few of the cases applying the prudential factors, the court has still found no political question (e.g., Ralls; Simon). [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Simon F. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 7:19 pm
Why did all this matter in this case? [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
It is no simple matter to modify complex existing systems in a way which will not compromise their efficiency and effectiveness. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Thanks, Simon, for drawing our attention, in your previous post, to the Peru – Agricultural Products case. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
See, also, Laurido v Simon, 489 F. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
See, also, Laurido v Simon, 489 F. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Why should this difference arguably matter? [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm
Interestingly, however, the newspaper does not quote its own proprietor on the matter, which is the obvious way to corroborate Stokes’s claim. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 2:21 pm
(And also interestingly, CDA s 230(c) which normally gives hosts complete immunity in matters of liability which might affect press freedom (such as defamation by parties hosted) does not apply to federal criminal liability.)But as Simon B also pointed out, there are lots of other cloud suppliers , lots in Europe even. [read post]
