Search for: "MAY v. SCOTT" Results 21 - 40 of 4,794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2007, 9:33 pm
Professor Scott Dodson has just posted an Essay to the Virginia Law Review's "In Brief" page that offers some thoughts on the recent case of Bell Atlantic, Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
Balkin and Sanford LevinsonDred Scott v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 8:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That theory can work in sexual harassment cases, but it can also work when professionals suffer a dramatic pay cut.The case is Scott v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 9:09 am by Kali Borkoski
The Court’s holding in Scott’s case that slaves were not citizens and could not sue in the courts later earned Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 10:31 am by Yvette Mabbun and Kelly Vazhappilly
Township of Scott, concluding that a plaintiff alleging that local governments have violated the Takings Clause under the Fifth Amendment may seek relief directly in federal court, as a constitutional violation occurs at the time of the taking without payment, even if just compensation is subsequently paid.[1] In the 5-4 majority opinion, the Court overruled, in part, Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 3:00 am by Glen C. Hansen
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, overruled the 34-year-old precedent in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:54 am by Sarah Lindsey
The Michigan Supreme Court issued an order in Scott v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm by Big Tent Democrat
Scott Lemeiux finds this "dramatization" of Gibbons v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 7:10 am by Unreported Opinions
In brief, if a taxpayer files a refund claim within three years of the date when the original return was filed, the amount of the refund or credit may not exceed the amount of the ... [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 10:33 am
The name Dred Scott may evoke memories of high school U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by Norman L. Eisen
Scott Perry (R-Penn.) is protected by the Speech or Debate Clause from the Jan. 6 criminal investigation. [read post]