Search for: "MCGRAW v. FAMILY "
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2022, 3:44 am
Miami Beach v McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052, 1055; see World Ambulette Transp., Inc. v Lee, 161 AD3d 1028; Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 143 AD3d 487). [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm
Cardozo, American Judge (McGraw-Hill, 1940) Andrew L. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 1:28 pm
LA is proud to point out that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
McGraw. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:37 am
Bethel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 3:26 am
I’ve named it after Quick Draw McGraw, one of my favorite, classic Saturday morning TV cartoons, and because it so nicely describes the unusual buy-sell mechanism enforced by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice David Schmidt in his fascinating decision earlier this month in Mintz v Pazer, Decision and Order, Index No. 502127/13 [Sup Ct, Kings County Mar. 12, 2014]. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:30 am
McGraw Hill Cos., Inc., 120 AD3d 1052 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Novikov v Oceana Holdings Corp., 46 Misc3d 561 [Sup Ct, Kings County 2014] [discussed here]). [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
CAFC Reverses TTAB's "COLD WAR MUSEUM" Decision Regarding Evidence of Record in Cancellation Proceeding CAFC Oral Argument: CAFC Hears Oral Argument in "CRASH DUMMIES" Appeal CAFC Hears Oral Argument in Southern Cal v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
ACLU, and again in Ashcroft v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 8:11 pm
” The Ontario Superior Court of Justice just released a new decision in CCLA v. [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
” 750 ILCS 5/503(d)(1) The spouse that did not operate the business will inevitably be deemed to have contributed to the family to an extent that allowed the business to flourish and, therefore, should be awarded a portion of the value of the business. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Over the last month, on our New Republic: Security States newsfeed, we rolled out a series designed to explain why fairly allocating the costs of software deficiencies between software makers and users is so critical to addressing the growing problem of vulnerability-ridden code—and how such a regime will require questioning some of our deep-seated beliefs about the very nature of software security. [read post]
