Search for: "MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Barbie's maker, Mattel, had alleged that the maker of the Bratz doll - MGA Entertainment- stole the idea for the Bratz doll by entering into a deal with the designer of the doll, Carter Bryant, who had previously worked for Mattel. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:02 am
He noted that based on the ruling of the Ninth Circuit in Mattel, Inc., v MGA Entertainment (No. 2:04-cv-09049-SGL-RNB), Rentmeester’s claim for infringement depended on two things: 1. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:03 am
(IP Dragon) Baby Tricycle Wars: Chinese babygood group victorious against US Mattel: Babygood Group v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
General Protecht Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:05 am
Mattel Inc. , a case pending in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Mattel, maker of the Barbie doll, asserted that a former employee, Carter Bryant, began drawing designs for the Bratz doll - made by his new employer MGA Entertainment ("MGA") - while he was still employed by Mattel. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:59 pm
The Ninth Circuit recently had the opportunity to consider some of these issues in the case of Mattel, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:25 pm
MGA Entertainment Inc., 09-55673 (9th Cir July 22, 2010). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Fred’s Capital Management Company (TTABlog) Mattel – Lawyer Barbie back in the Federal Circuit dealing with Bratz: MGA Entertainment v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm
MGA Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 2:36 am
Bratz freed in time for the Holiday- Last Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit ruled that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls (see Bratz identity parade below) despite having lost a copyright infringement suit last year brought by Mattel (which included a jury award of $100 million damages). [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Mattel, Inc., 216 U.S.P.Q. 28 (N.D. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 5:34 pm
MGA Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:55 am
Accession, Inc (Patently-O) CAFC: Jurisdiction in patent declaratory judgment actions: Radio Systems Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 12:12 pm
Continuing our annual tradition, we have compiled our top developments and headlines for 2019 & 2020 in trade secret, non-compete, and computer fraud law. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
