Search for: "MICHAEL P. KING"
Results 21 - 40
of 341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 1:24 pm
Through stubborn diplomacy, and as an inspiring leader in battle, she paved the way for Charles to be crowned King at Reims. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 11:35 am
See, e.g., Stephen P. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 7:46 am
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:48 am
The Satmar Hasids (who get their name from their "origin community in Romania) is now "the most populous Hasidic group in the world today" (p. 370). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
As mentioned above, on 20 and 21 July 2022, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P and King LJ) heard the appeal Guardian News and Media v Executor of HRH Prince Philip challenging the decision to exclude the press from the hearing in September 2021 regarding the will of Prince Philip. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:27 pm
The letter was signed by Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Representative James P. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Michael P. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 10:25 pm
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 8:00 am
Dizzyingly, at this moment in late June 2022, even as all sane Americans applaud Michael Luttig’s telling his party that his former clerk John Eastman’s constitutional arguments were nuts, the Supreme Court is poised to announce a series of blockbuster decisions in which formerly off-the-wall right-wing constitutional arguments become law. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
Daily, Mar. 21, 2001 ("William King, a professor of Afro-American studies at CU, said that while free speech allows for ads [stridently denouncing the calls for reparations for slavery] to appear in print, common sense should keep them out…. 'It's a whole lot like shouting "fire" in a crowded theater,' said King. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 3:14 am
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:22 am
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 3:33 pm
“New Challenges in Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments”, in Franco Ferrari, Diego P. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
Pix Credit: Michael A. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 10:18 am
Professor Michael J. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
The defendant, the former King of Spain, argued sovereign immunity. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 12:25 pm
(Kyd, p. 25.) [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 7:20 am
(book review) Millet, Hélène and Hanly, Michael. [read post]
