Search for: "MITCHELL v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
We hold that plaintiffs have not shown the requisite culpability, and AFFIRM the district court's ruling. 07a0473p.06 Richardson, et al v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 10:53 am by Rachel Bercovitz
A D.C. federal district court judge ruled yesterday in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am by Law Lady
ELBAUM, Appellee. 4th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court erred in awarding wife attorney's fees without specific findings as to number of hours expended by wife's attorney and whether those hours are reasonableROBERT MITCHELL, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 7:10 am by Mitchell Boyarsky
Moran et al. plaintiff Eagle was employed as the CEO of Edcomm, Inc., a company that provided training services. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
,Plaintiffs and Respondents,v.CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENTOF CORRECTIONS ANDREHABILITATION et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Chris Mirasola
During two days of nonclassified argumentation, the defendants in U.S. v Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. argued that the government has delayed, denied, and/or destroyed discovery documents. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  (And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
City of Philadelphia et al., the Honorable Mitchell Goldberg from the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted the chamber a preliminary injunction on the Inquiry Provision in April 2018, holding that the Ordinance violates employers’ freedom of speech rights. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]