Search for: "MITCHELL v. DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al" Results 21 - 40 of 64
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Heidi A. Nadel
Mitchell, 15-P-858 (Rule 1:28 Decision) (Jul. 5, 2016) vacated the trial court’s anti-SLAPP fees order and remanded the matter to the trial court to try again. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
§ 1125(a)) Relief for Unfair Competition Under California Business And Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:01 am by Administrator
Nguyen (B.Q.) et al. 2015 ONCA 278Civil Rights – Evidence Summary: A man was shot and killed in a bar. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:47 am
Thus, companies considering forming or joining a group to file an IPR should consider that one consequence of filing a petition as one of several real parties in interest is that they will not have the opportunity to be separately heard. 505 Games, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:19 am by Law Lady
ELBAUM, Appellee. 4th District.Dissolution of marriage -- Attorney's fees -- Trial court erred in awarding wife attorney's fees without specific findings as to number of hours expended by wife's attorney and whether those hours are reasonableROBERT MITCHELL, Appellant, v. [read post]