Search for: "MONROE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
THE CAPTAIN REPORTS: ELECTION DAY 2016 ...............PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES .......DONALD TRUMP ELECTED AS THE 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATESHistoric, unprecedented, shocking, and clearly the biggest upset in American political history. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:16 pm by Amul Kalia
More importantly, it was reportedly frustration with the British resolution of 1785 authorizing the Department of Foreign Affairs to open and inspect any mail related to the safety and interests of the United States that led James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and James Monroe to write to each other in code.In fact, in the 1999 decision throwing out the government’s export regulations on encryption in EFF’s case Bernstein v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:21 am by Mark Ashton
  Yesterday was a landmark day in America. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
  Although BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
  Power, politics, and poison:  the story behind National Cotton Council of America v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm by thejaghunter
The Tenth Amendment under full frontal Assault “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 5:41 pm by Erin Miller
”  Soon after Iqbal was decided, the Fourth Circuit in Monroe v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]