Search for: "MOORE v. CRAFT" Results 21 - 40 of 114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2011, 12:31 pm by Francis Davey
Awful title due to NL himself.Mew v Tristmire concerned whether or not two “houseboats” were “dwelling houses let as separate dwellings” as required in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988 in order for them to be assured tenancies.The “houseboats” appear to have been converted WWII landing craft that were, in the event, not used in the D-Day invasion. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:31 pm by Francis Davey
Awful title due to NL himself.Mew v Tristmire concerned whether or not two “houseboats” were “dwelling houses let as separate dwellings” as required in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988 in order for them to be assured tenancies.The “houseboats” appear to have been converted WWII landing craft that were, in the event, not used in the D-Day invasion. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
"Allowing different remedies in state law cases heard in federal courts on pendent jurisdiction would undermine the 'twin aims of the Erie rule: discouragement of forum-shopping and avoidance of inequitable administration of the laws.'" LaShawn A. by Moore v. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 11:03 am by Steven Boutwell
The Court’s ruling emphasized changes in the riverboat’s physical characteristics, purpose, and function – the craft having been moored for nearly 15 years. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
Liou    Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusSENTENCINGKAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:08 pm by Trevor Cutaiar
Caldwell argued that the Benoit court’s finding that the vessel had been indefinitely moored was not the standard created the United States Supreme Court in Stewart v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Supreme Court didn’t address and debunk ISL on the merits (as it later did last summer in Moore v Harper), the Court dismissed Texas’s filing on the ground that Texas lacked standing under Article III because “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 2:27 pm by David
Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141, 146 (1989). [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 3:38 pm by Jason Mazzone
The important exception is the Seventh Circuit panel's decision in Moore v. [read post]