Search for: "MS v. People" Results 21 - 40 of 4,073
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2024, 12:38 am by Frank Cranmer
Antisemitism and French criminal law In Allouche v France [2024] ECHR 305  Ms Allouche, who is Jewish, found herself in a disturbing relationship with one B, a bartender in a café near her workplace, which ended with him sending her antisemitic e-mail threats of violence, rape and death. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 3:26 am
Vazquez, they simply forgot (or weren't told by their attorneys or people in HR) that she technically had to re-sign this agreement for it to be effective. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:01 am by Brooke MacKenzie
Although this is not how the Law Society framed its arguments, it seems to me that public outcry in matters like AA, Melnick, and Colangelo is at its core premised in the belief that people who committed certain offences should simply never be granted the privilege of a law licence. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
  The actions over Putin’s People resulted in a number of substantive modifications being made to the text of the book to the satisfaction of the claimants. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm by Josh Blackman
[Professor Shugerman's argument that the 1793 Hamilton Document, that is, a list of "every person holding any civil office or employment under the United States, (except the judges)," was intended to ensure compliance with the Constitution's Sinecure Clause lacks support.] [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Klara Nedrelow
”[21] Israel contended that “the statements relied upon by South Africa as containing genocidal rhetoric were all taken out of context and in fact were made in reference to Hamas, not the Palestinian people as such. [read post]