Search for: "MUSLIM ADVOCATES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
If the State Department issues the mother-in-law a visa, promptly, this plaintiff’s claim becomes moot and should be dismissed. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 11:50 am
The United States described the evolution of its position on Jerusalem from this point forward in its 2014 merits brief in the matter of Zivotofsky v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:30 am
FRENCH: Cliquez ici pour le télécharger. .GRAND CHAMBERCASE OF S.A.S. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:32 am
The Times tells us that the Trump administration has amended its ban on the entry of refugees from seven Muslim-majority countries at the urging of the Pentagon to allow the families of Iraqi interpreters into the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 4:26 am
United States, the justices ruled 8-0 that co-conspirators who do not benefit personally from illegal proceeds cannot be ordered to forfeit property. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Randall (1958), which struck down a denial of a property tax exemption to people and organizations that "advocate[] the overthrow of the Government of the United States . . . by . . . violence . . . or who advocate[] the support of a foreign government against the United States in the event of hostilities": [A] discriminatory denial of a tax exemption for engaging in speech is a limitation on free speech. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm
Nevertheless, advocates diligently pursue waivers for their clients, based on undue hardship, lack of threat to the United States, and the overall national interest. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
On 1 December 2023, Mr Justice Jay handed down judgement in favour of the defendant in the case of Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB). [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
" One of the petitions considered on Tuesday addresses the issue of whether federal judges have the power to release detainees into the United States. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:13 pm
Negusie further argues that the statute does not require the government to grant asylum to every qualified application, but instead leaves such decisions to the discretion of the Justice Department. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
We also continue to record the severe crackdown against Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslims, Tibetans and Hong Kongers. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:00 pm
This month the Guardian ran two opinion pieces on the presence of ‘sharia’ in the United Kingdom. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 8:41 am
As Justice Samuel Alito noted in his concurring opinion in Buono, during World War I, “[m]ore than 3,500 Jewish soldiers … gave their lives for the United States. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Congress over the past few decades to make it more and more difficult for an individual to be granted refugee status in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
