Search for: "Magee v. State Bar"
Results 21 - 28
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2011, 2:40 am
As a general rule, a valid release that is clear and unambiguous on its face constitutes a complete bar to an action on a claim which is the subject of the release absent fraudulent inducement, fraudulent concealment, misrepresentation, mutual mistake [*4] or duress (see Littman v Magee, 54 AD3d 14, 17, 860 N.Y.S.2d 24 [2008]). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:30 am
In Littman v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 4:00 am
Two years ago, in Littman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Magee case that, along with Blue Chip, came under attack in Centro and Arfa.) [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Magee v DaimlerChrysler Corp, 472 Mich 108 (2005). [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Magee-Women’s Hospital, 876 A.2d 400, 407-08 (Pa. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
Therefore, Deborah's claims for breach of fiduciary duty are barred by the affirmative defense of quasi-estoppel. [read post]
