Search for: "Mahindra "
Results 21 - 40
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2018, 3:28 pm
Way back in 2011, we did a post providing a descriptive comment on the decision of the Madras High Court in Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v Sivakama Sundari S Narayana S B Murthy where it was held that it was not really necessary to file the award in the court within whose jurisdiction the award was transferred for the purposes of executing it in another court. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 2:29 pm
The Mahindra Humanities Center, Harvard University, invites applications for one-year postdoctoral fellowships (2017-18) in connection with the Center’s Andrew W. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 11:01 pm
The Mahindra Humanities Center (Harvard) invites applications for one-year postdoctoral fellowships in connection with the Center’s Andrew W. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 4:18 pm
The Mahindra Humanities Center at Harvard University invites applications for one-year postdoctoral fellowships in connection with the Center’s Andrew W. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:22 am
Given high profile supplier failures such as Satyam Computer Services (subsequently rescued by Mahindra Group although not before several significant customers including Merrill Lynch (now a part of Bank of America) and State Farm Insurance terminated their contracts with Satyam), as well as headline hitting events such as factory fires and a building collapse in Bangladesh, companies should ensure that third party supplier risk management is given adequate resource and… [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 6:48 am
Mahindra & Mahindra, Ltd., No. 12-02048 (N.D. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:07 am
The Mahindra Humanities Center (Harvard University) invites applications for one-year postdoctoral fellowships in connection with the Center’s new Andrew W. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 2:08 am
India’s evolution as an emerging marketIf we go back in time to early 2000, companies providing IB services in India were either operating by way of joint ventures between an Indian affiliate and a global financial institution (e.g.. joint venture between Kotak Mahindra and Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and the JM Group, Merrill Lynch and the DSP Group) or were global financial conglomerates like Citigroup, JP Morgan, etc., which had wholly owned subsidiaries in India providing IB… [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
Justice RM LodhaSupreme Court of IndiaThe Full Bench of the Supreme Court in Gian Singh Vs. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:05 am
Further comments on this particular aspect of Mahindra’s wrongful conduct will be made should Mahindra decide to respond in court to this lawsuit. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 8:45 am
Here are the noteworthy posts, articles and cases of the past week: Trade Secret and Non-Compete Cases and Posts: Automobile dealers from around the U.S. have sued India-based truck manufacturer Mahindra & Mahindra, Ltd. and its U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 6:20 am
Senate aides said four Indian companies would qualify for the significantly higher fees: Tata, Infosys, Wipro and Mahindra Satyam, all of which operate in the United States and are criticized as “body shops” because they provide outsourcing of Indian professionals to American companies. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 2:17 pm
Indian technology company Tech Mahindra is absorbing scandal-plagued rival Mahindra Satyam in a $1 billion deal. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 8:56 pm
In this case, Navyug was incorporated on November 8, 2011 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Mahindra Ugine Steel Company Ltd. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
Individual, D2005-1068 (WIPO December 21, 2005) and Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:22 pm
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v Sivakama Sundari S Narayana S B Murthy Case: C.R.P. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 12:03 pm
Langston with the blog faculty Source: Moneycontrol.com An MoU [...] was signed by Mahindra Aerospace and Mahindra Satyam in Mumbai for a trade partnership with the Eurocopter Group and its subsidiary Eurocopter India. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 2:31 am
Domains by Proxy, Inc. and Sonia Long, D2009-1435 (WIPO December 10, 2009) (Complainant had trademark rights in his personal name, which he used in connection with his fashion design business); Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:20 am
It suggests that the curative petitions seeking the setting aside of the 1996 Keshub Mahindra judgment did not invoke any of the relevant grounds justifying the Court's curative jurisdiction and that the petitioners did not offer sufficient explanation for filing the petitions 14 years after the judgment. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:55 am
Keshub Mahindra) filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation against the 1996 judgment. [read post]
