Search for: "Mail Media Ltd."
Results 21 - 40
of 607
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2016, 4:08 pm
Zelo Street also has a piece entitled “Mail Supreme Court Assault Busted”. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Mail on Sunday apologised for publishing allegations that prosecuting counsel had “buried evidence” that police officers had been taking bribes. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Internet and Social Media The Press Gazette had a piece “Tech platforms now editors says Hancock as Trump banned from social media and Parler switched off by Amazon”. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:09 pm
Discusses the media’s criticism of the judge, including Daily Mail editor-in-chief Paul Dacre’s attack prompted by the case brought by Formula One boss Max Mosley against the News of the World. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
In Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd v Palmer [2011] QCA 286 the Court of Appea [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm
Max Hill v Mail on Sunday, A Man v The Gazette (Paisley) Ward v Mail on Sunday. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:04 pm
Research In Motion Ltd. reiterated that it can’t access, or provide access to, emails sent through its BlackBerry corporate computer networks, following local media reports that the Canadian company has set up servers in India so that local security agencies can directly monitor the service. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions In Australia, a series of cases from the New South Wales courts this week dealing with procedural issues: Scott Gartrell v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 632 (concerning the form of defamatory imputations); Walsh v Nationwide News Pty Ltd [2011] NSWDC 42 (directions in relation to jury questions); Eugene Liu v Fairfax Media Publications [2011] NSWSC 612 (ruling on meaning) and Wendy… [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
The Parent company DMG Media said in a statement: “In papers submitted to the High Court, the publisher of the Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday denied under oath that its journalists had commissioned or obtained information derived from phone hacking, phone tapping, bugging, computer or email hacking or burglary to order“. [read post]
30 May 2011, 9:26 am
We had a post about the decision and it received some media coverage among the wall to wall “twittergate” coverage, for example in the “Independent” and the “Daily Mail“. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
Open Justice and Court Reporting On 22 June 2016, in the case of London Borough of Sutton v Gray & Ors v Guardian News and Media Ltd [2016] EWHC 1608 (Fam) Pauffley J dismissed an application by the media for publication of the judgment of King J concerning the case of the murdered child, Ellie Butler. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:09 pm
And as many others pointed out, the Mail Online site states explicitly: “Published by Associated Newspapers Ltd Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday and Metro Media Group. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm
The Media blog has pointed out how papers such the Daily Mail and the Sun have ‘disowned’ Teresa May after Thursday’s election results. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am
On Wednesday 10 April 2024 there were hearings in the cases of Jones Nickolds ltd v Ian Robert Pearce KB-2024-000886 and Specialty Coffee Association Ltd v Elizabeth Odushola KB-2023-002556. [read post]
23 May 2010, 3:11 am
Some imputations were struck out, the plaintiff was given leave to replead others The case of Palace Films Pty Ltd & Ors v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd & Ors [2010] NSWSC 415 concerned a claim for breach of confidence and defamation. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:46 am
Globe and Mail Ltd., [1961] S.C.R. 474; Jones v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:40 pm
In Order No. 12, ALJ Pender denied Respondents Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
The Mail has responded to critics by telling them to “get a life. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:05 pm
Mail and Sun found guilty over gun pics contempt PA Media Lawyer, Press Gazette – 3 March 2011. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
They have the same rights of free speech as anyone else, subject to the same constraints” (AG v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109, 201). [read post]
