Search for: "Maine v. Jones" Results 21 - 40 of 554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
For example, in a homeless shelter, the donors and main beneficiaries (users) of the organizational service rarely overlap. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 8:06 am by Tobin Admin
The defendants’ main argument was that the documents did exist—but the contents were inconclusive. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 4:00 am by Nonprofit Blogger
Waldo County Courthouse, Belfast Maine 1961 In Belfast last month, the Waldo County [Maine] Superior Court issued a split decision in Peach Ridge Sanctuary v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am by Jeff Welty
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In addition, Wilson was one of the main authors of the 1790 Pennsylvania constitution—another surprisingly neglected fact about him, which bears on Moore v. [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Katelynn Catalano
House of Representatives passed a bill that would get rid of a statue of Roger Taney, the former Supreme Court justice who wrote the 1857 Dred Scott v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:20 am by Brett Natarelli
The trade group raised four main arguments: the Payday Lending Rule is unconstitutional because the CFPB Director is insulated from being removed by the President (the same issue presented in Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:39 pm by James Kwong
Rose also reported on Jones v Irmac Roads ([2022] EWHC 495 (IPEC)), a decision delivered by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The main opposition Court has expressed its intention to challenge this law in the Constitutional Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
If, for instance, Fox is about to report on the Glenn–Norton feud, it can't just confidently assume that a uniform federal law would apply, or that the law of its main place of business (New York) would apply. [read post]