Search for: "Marc Blitz"
Results 21 - 40
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2007, 9:49 am
Hillary starts her five day, 99 Iowa county "hill-a-copter" blitz Sunday. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 2:29 pm
Kansas Leandra Lederman (Indiana Law) Nebraska Marc Blitz (Oklahoma City Law) [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
Chien Stanley in Cyberspace: Why the Privacy Protection of the First Amendment Should Be More Like That of the Fourth Marc Jonathan Blitz Restoring Equipoise to Child Welfare Rebecca Aviel Reframing Antitrust in Light of Scientific Revolution: Accounting for Transaction Costs in Rule of Reason Analysis Alan J. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 3:48 am
To that end, please welcome for the first time to Prawfs: Hadar Aviram (crim/Hastings) and Marc Blitz (OKCU/con law). [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:09 pm
The presenters were Marc Blitz, Susan Freiwald, Jim Harper, Peter Swire, Chris Slobogin, and me. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:00 am
It is coming out in The Law of Virtual and Augmented Reality (Woody Barfield and Marc Blitz, eds). [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:53 am
Here's a free link to the law review article, Therapeutic Forgetting: The Legal and Ethical Implications of Memory Dampening (that Marc Blitz was kind enough to highlight in his recent post on freedom of thought). [read post]
31 May 2009, 12:18 pm
I have finally gotten around to reading Iqbal (it's been a busy couple of weeks), and it occurs to me that a pleading standard that demands "plausibility" in a complaint is precisely the sort of case in which, in Marc Blitz's and Orin Kerr's words, empathy is "doctrinally relevant. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:14 pm
Our current list of attendees and/or presenters include: Mike Cahill, Miriam Baer, Nelson Tebbe, Verity Winship, Bill Araiza, Katy Kuh, Hillel Levin, Howard Wasserman, Giovanna Shay, Chris Lund, and Marc Blitz (and me). [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:49 am
” Matthew Mpoke Bigg and Marc Santora report for the New York Times. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:50 am
At CoOp, we will participate in that discussion online, bringing together guest blogger Marvin Ammori with thought leaders (and guest bloggers) Marc Blitz, Brett Frischmann, Gregory Magarian, Zephyr Teachout, and Tim Zick to discuss Marvin’s article and broader concerns about expressive spaces in the twenty-first century. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 8:50 am
The panel, put together by Nicholson Price, will take place at AALS on January 8th at 11AM EST, and will feature myself (Camilla Hrdy), Dan Brean, Marc Blitz, Deven Desai, and Victoria Sutton. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 10:44 am
Here’s the initial participant list: Usman Ahmed // Georgetown Law (adjunct)/eBay David Ardia // University of North Carolina School of Law Rachel Aridor-Hershkovitz // Faculty of Law, Haifa University (PhD Student) Jane Bambauer // University of Arizona Law School Derek Bambauer // University of Arizona Law School Ann Bartow // Pace Law School Marc Blitz // Oklahoma City University School of Law Annemarie Bridy // University of Idaho College of Law Irene Calboli // Marquette… [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 8:16 am
Declaration of Marc Weinsweig in Support of First Day Motions. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:13 pm
We also have a number of distinguished veterans: Bill Araiza, Paul Secunda, Michael Risch, Marc DeGirolami, Marc Blitz, and Will Baude. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:03 pm
Although some lies may receive free speech protection under the First Amendment, a deepfake spreading false information may lose First Amendment protection if it is “not only a falsity, but a forgery as well,” suggests Marc Jonathan Blitz of Oklahoma City University School of Law in an article published in Oklahoma Law Review. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 3:24 pm
Speech #2—Parlor B Anjali S. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 6:46 am
And that was exactly the point of those very political ads, said Marc Solomon, director of MassEquality, the pro-gay group that sponsored the three commercials. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 4:39 pm
Marc Mauer, executive director of the Washington D.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
” Marc Jonathan Blitz has explored the intersection of free speech and privacy values in Stanley v. [read post]