Search for: "Marchese v. Marchese"
Results 21 - 26
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2018, 4:28 am
“Under the so-called storm in progress’ rule, a property owner will not be held responsible for accidents occurring as a result of the accumulation of snow and ice on its premises until an adequate period of time has passed following the cessation of the storm to allow the owner an opportunity to ameliorate the hazards caused by the storm” (Marchese v Skenderi, 51 AD3d 642, 642; see Solazzo v New York City Tr. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am
Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
The case of Goudeau v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
See Salamone‑Finchum v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On 28 October 2016 Haddon-Cave J handed down judgment in the case of Begg v BBC ([2016] EWHC 2688 (QB)) [pdf]. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
