Search for: "Marcum v. United States" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
E.D. N.Y.: Statute of limitations on search claim did not run until after state appellate court held search was invalid
5 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
United States v. [read post]
FourthAmendment.com - http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1
The weirdest military justice story of 2011: the strange tale of the non-repeal of Article 125 [Warning: includes offensive material]
2 Jan 2012, 12:39 am by Dwight Sullivan
Rives in the case of United States v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
Don't Ask, Don't Tell . . . and Don't Dismiss
21 May 2008, 11:03 am
United States (2003) 539 U.S. 166, finding them equally applicable here: Courts, however, must consider the facts of the individual case in evaluating the Government's interest . . . . [read post]
The California Blog of Appeal - http://www.calblogofappeal.com
CA1: Breaking news - First seems to approve "Don't Ask; Don't tell" on First Amendment Grounds
9 Jun 2008, 7:42 pm
Cook  v. [read post]
Appellate Law & Practice - http://appellate.typepad.com/appellate/
Sad Day for Free Speech and Press Freedom in Texas: Corpus Christi Caller-Times v. ex-Chamber of Commerce CEO Terry Carter (Tex. May 24, 2019)
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
Marcum, Paul C. [read post]
Texas Causes of Action Blawg - http://causeofactionelements.blogspot.com/
Leonard perhaps most important decision out of the C.A.A.F. this century.
20 Mar 2007, 2:05 pm
In United States v. [read post]
CAAFlog - http://caaflog.blogspot.com/
Untangling the Knots of Child Custody Relocation Litigation
13 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
Marcum, 2006 WL 2194903 (Ky. [read post]
Divorce Law Journal - http://louisvilledivorce.typepad.com/info/
Spooky Torts: The 2023 List of Litigation Horrors
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
Kelly v. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/
Spooky Torts: The 2022 List of Litigation Horrors
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
However, it is a modified comparative negligence state so they must show that they are 50 percent or less at fault. [read post]
Jonathan Turley - https://jonathanturley.org/