Search for: "Marine v. Marine"
Results 21 - 40
of 4,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2009, 4:00 pm
The Second District Court of Appeal has modified its opinion and denied rehearing in Marin v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 3:01 pm
“Bell-Boeing has been aware of hard clutch engagement problems in the V-22 Ospreys since 2010,” said Timothy Loranger, a Marine Corps veteran and lawyer representing the families of those killed in the accident. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:44 am
Mariners then starts to build the building. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 6:46 am
Today the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Atlantic Marine Construction Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:15 am
PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellee. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:29 am
AIC Ltd v Marine Pilot Ltd Court of Appeal “Where a charterparty provided that the vessel should load at a single named safe port, the charterers thereby warranted the safety of that port. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 11:47 am
Phillips v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 12:08 am
The case is Zabala v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 9:23 am
Morales-Vázquez – Background Carlos Morales-Vázquez purchased an insurance policy for his forty-eight-foot Cavalier yacht from marine insurer QBE Seguros. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 4:05 am
In Colonel Financial Management Officer v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 3:58 pm
The case is Pactrans Air & Seas, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:43 am
On October 19, 2010, the Louisiana Supreme Court issued its opinion in Marin v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 12:08 pm
Co. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
In Toor v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
On Friday, August 4, 2023, the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted summary judgment in favor of the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”) in the case of Melone v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 1:47 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:35 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 12:30 pm
the case is Langfitt v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:44 am
Gard Marine and Energy Ltd v Tunnicliffe and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1052; [2010] WLR (D) 242 ”Where, by reference to the Lugano Convention and art 6(1) of the Judgments Regulation, one was considering whether it was expedient to hear and determine claims within the jurisdiction order to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings, regard was to be had, inter alia, to the question whether the claims arose out of the same situation in… [read post]
