Search for: "Marino v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 1:12 am
United States, 458 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir.2006); Clark Equip. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 11:26 pm
United States, 458 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir.2006); Clark Equip. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 11:18 am
Why did the Dominican interest and also of the United States disappear? [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 1:07 pm
We feel it’s time to examine both the legislative history, and the statutory application, of crime victims’ restitution acts, both of which were discussed at some length by the Second Circuit on August 18, 2011 in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Michael Young cites the Court’s 1995 ruling in United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 10:59 am
United States (1980) (stating that Congress's intent in prohibiting the possession of firearms by felons was directly related to "the problem of firearm abuse by felons"); see also Kane v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 3:46 am
If you're feeling cosmopolitan, or just like showing off that you can read French, here's Laure Marino's Le Blog de Laure Marino -- Droit IP/IT. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
And in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 11:46 am
On March 15 the ECtHR, sitting as the Grand Chamber,decided on the Naït-Litman v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
This case (Merrimack Mutual Fire Ins Co v. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 1:01 pm
Pix Credit HERE The United Nations General Assembly on Wednesday approved a nonbinding resolution condemning Russia for invading Ukraine and demanding that it withdraw its military forces. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 1:27 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
$500 Fine, Exceeding Forfeiture Amount, Probation Did Not Improperly Penalize Defendant's Trial Right
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
On this basis the Court concluded that the Schauzu publication discloses olanzapine as one of its compounds.In its assessment, the Court took into account the EPO case law on flaws and mistakes in disclosures (T 89/87, T 412/91, T77/87, T 591/90).The Court also admitted that its decision deviated from earlier decisions in the United States, China, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, United Kingdom, Austria and Spain, giving a brief explanation… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 8:47 am
" Marino v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 3:04 am
" Marino v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
Its earlier quotation from Buckley v UK would seem to intimate so. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 7:40 am
James Marino. [read post]
