Search for: "Maritime Management v. U.s.*"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
Southland Corp. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:31 am
This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Docket: 08-763 Title: Mabry v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
(…) There are exceptions for waiver, commercial activity, expropriations, succession, personal injury in the United States, arbitration, maritime liens, state-sponsored terrorism, and counterclaims. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative, NBR, 2017. 1 • the successful initiation of an impressive array of projects extending across the continental and maritime domain. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 6:15 am
In U.S. v Pena the defendant was charged with a federal crime of conspiracy to knowingly fail to maintain an accurate oil record book on board the vessel, in violation of 33 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 2:06 pm
”Barr cited Bunge Corp. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
Bridges v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm
Co. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm
.: The House Homeland Security Subcommittee for Transportation and Maritime Security will hold a hearing on homeland security priorities in the Arctic. [read post]
9 May 2018, 4:35 pm
Devries 17-1104 Issue: Whether products-liability defendants can be held liable under maritime law for injuries caused by products that they did not make, sell or distribute. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Court of Appeals for the 3d Circuit, citing “maritime law’s special solicitude for the safety and protection of sailors,” held that the even though the Navy and not the manufacturers added asbestos insulation to the products, the “manufacturer of a bare-metal product may be held liable for a plaintiff’s injuries suffered from later-added asbestos-containing materials if the facts show the plaintiff’s injuries were a reasonably foreseeable result of the… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
Title: Cobell v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Said and United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:10 am
” Amchem Products, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Vilches-Navarrete, No. 06-1942 Conviction and sentence for cocaine possession in violation of Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act ("MDLEA") and conspiracy to distribute cocaine is affirmed over defendant's claims that: 1) the MDLEA is unconstitutional; 2) the district court lacked jurisdiction; 3) the district court erroneously refused to suppress evidence; 4) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and 5) his sentence was unreasonable under Booker; and 6)… [read post]
