Search for: "Mark A. Anderson"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,158
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 4:17 pm
Join our first webinar in the series that marks the launch of the French Language Case Law Database. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
Anderson (Criminal; Disqualification of Prosecutor) Puyallup Tribe of Indians v. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm
The implementation of the Single Permit Directive has been marked by the significant leeway that has been afforded to Member States. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
Anderson. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
In Alameda County, Court Commissioner Mark Fickes’ opponent in the March 5 election, Michael Johnson, filed a formal complaint against Fickes for publicly supporting District Attorney Pamela Price, whose office regularly argues cases in Superior Court. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
Anderson. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
Mark S. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Anderson. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Anderson. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Anderson. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Anderson as a basis for leaving the case to the political process. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:52 am
Anderson makes five arguments that if, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment,… Continue reading The post Keisler and Bernstein: “Trump’s Reply Brief ‘Officer’ And ‘Office’ Arguments Miss The Mark” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
Misdemeanors, while less severe than felonies, can still leave a lasting mark on your criminal record. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1] [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words on January 6… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Anderson have pivoted to a new strategy. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
Mark Lemley: a surprising number of your examples involved women. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Anderson: Jill Lepore, David Blight, Drew Gilpin Faust, and John Fabian Witt. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm
Anderson—contend that Trump is disqualified to serve as President. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 6:26 am
Anderson, et al. [read post]