Search for: "Mark A. G"
Results 21 - 40
of 5,567
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2014, 4:30 am
Rejecting the NY Giants' argument that the purported fame of its G-MAN mark must be considered in the Section 2(d) analysis, the Board found the mark (for "shirts; T-shirts; tops") likely to cause confusion with the registered mark GMAN SPORTS & Design for overlapping goods [SPORTS disclaimed]. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 11:08 pm
LOOMIS mark. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 4:05 pm
(In brief, these alternative theories are off the mark because they ignore Gödel’s interest in logical contradictions and the problem of self-reference.) [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
The Second Circuit provided, in Time Inc. v Petersen Publ’g Co., here, six factors which courts use to establish secondary meaning: (1) advertising expenditures, (2) consumer studies linking the mark to a source, (3) unsolicited media coverage of the product, (4) sales success, (5) attempts to plagiarize the mark and (6) length and exclusivity of the mark’s use. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:48 am
In a remarkably contemptuous move, three illegal immigrants marked for deportation after committing crimes are suing the U.S. government over the program that targeted them for removal. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 4:18 am
As a result, “only a mark which departs significantly from the norm or customs of the sector of the goods and services at issue and thereby fulfils its essential function of indicating origin is not devoid of any distinctive character” (Vuitton, T-105/19, para 17).Over the past two years alone, the following marks failed to satisfy the “significant departure” test: A significant – though rather isolated – exception in this review is Guerlain,… [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 8:38 am
Following the success of the German comedy film FACK JU GÖHTE, the appellant, Constantin Film Production GmbH, filed for the word mark FACK JU GÖHTE in several classes including class 9 for recorded media and class 41 for film entertainment. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 2:18 am
Pro se Applicant Cheryl Lynn Ingberg lost her appeal from a refusal to register the mark LUVD G & Design (shown below) for various human clothing items. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:03 am
The rush to file trade mark applications to capitalize on a trending term or phrase is not new. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:41 am
Novell suit.Guiding Rights Blog is about "Trademarks, Copyright and the Internet, by Mark V.B. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:44 pm
One strand of this afternoon's programme at the Fordham IP Conference was dedicated to trade marks -- starting with premium products and the brands with which they are associated.Speaking first, Monika Tomczak-Górlikowska (Miller Canfield, Warsaw) contrasted bricks & mortar shopping with internet commerce within the context of vertical sales restraints in the European Union. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 9:30 pm
The Principles- Likelihood of ConfusionAs summarised by the UKIPO, are as follows: (a) the likelihood of confusion must be appreciated globally, taking account of all relevant factors; (b) the matter must be judged through the eyes of the average consumer of the goods/ services in question; who is deemed to be reasonably well informed and reasonably circumspect and observant - but who rarely has the chance to make direct comparisons between marks and must instead rely upon the imperfect… [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 3:28 am
Yesterday's G-STRING case was not precedential. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 4:13 pm
Johnson’s Publ’g Co., 473 F.2d 901, 902 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP § 1207.01. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
See Mark Twain and the Copyright Dilemma, by Edward G. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:13 pm
Applicant G. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 4:04 am
(g) The evidence was clearly presented and easy to follow (albeit 15 pages long). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 10:51 am
On June 22, 2015, United States District Judge Mark G. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:59 am
" The MLG element, although somewhat larger, is partially obscured by the design, with the bold letters “M” and “G” being more prominent than the not bold letter “L,” which has been placed in a lower position than “M” and “G,” as it is being used as the central pivot point and base for the scales of justice, making it less likely that consumers will recall the MLG element.As to appearance, the Board found the… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 1:05 am
Co. v Johnson’s Publ’g Co., 473 F.2d 901, 902 (C.C.P.A. 1973); TMEP § 1207.01. [read post]
