Search for: "Mark B Rogers"
Results 21 - 40
of 422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Concerns about the Rogers test. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
This included a calculation by Dr Roger Ball of The University of the West of England of the approximate gain Colston made through the Royal Africa Company [34] to [36]. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
’” Summarizing her perspective, Kagan concludes that “whatever you make of Rogers — and … we take no position on that … — it has always been a cabined doctrine,” limited to products that use the mark in a “non-source-identifying way. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Given this history, Dodd-Frank authorities, and not to mention what happened in Archegos, I supported the Commission’s proposed rules to a) require prompt disclosure of large security-based swap positions and b) strengthen investor protection in security-based swaps.[24] Resiliency Let’s turn back to the 1990s for a moment. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
Compare Brief for Professor Roger O'Keefe as Amicus Curiae 11–16 with Brief for Mark B. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Mark Haight 51. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
” 1 NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT § 2A.10(B) (2022 ed.). [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am
The Rogers test protects the rights of trademark owners by allowing courts to ban certain false or misleading uses of their marks. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
This marks the beginning of what might be called the aretaic turn in moral philosophy--initiating both a return to Aristotle's theory of the virtues and the development new varieties of virtue theory. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
Discussant: Mark Lemley Maybe corpus linguistics can help w/things like descriptiveness and nominative fair use, though skeptical about confusion or fame (b/c you need a standard). [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm
Ramsey: Rogers uses the phrase explicitly misleading; b [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Session 1: Identifying and Explaining Anachronisms Introduction: Mark McKenna: Every year, a TM exam could be written differently: one a very conventional exam question with Company A using one mark and Company B using a similar mark/similar goods, conventional walk through confusion factors in the way the test was designed to deal with. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:40 am
Bob Brauneis: Modern GIs seem so much like certification marks that Jeanne Fromer’s criticisms of the latter seem to apply--used to fight between producers to exclude some b/c there’s no effective concept of terroir to discipline the concept. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
We have Roger Parloff on the Jan. 6 criminal prosecutions, Quinta Jurecic and Molly Reynolds on the Jan. 6 Committee, Tyler McBrien on climate security, Benjamin Wittes on the Mar-a-Lago investigation, Scott R. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
” Another employee noted that “Google automatically assumes you mean [the F]lora[-B]ama [Lounge]. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
US General Services Admin, the artist’s discussion of VARA here marks the beginning of recognition of the importance of this act in future cases considering the protection of public art. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 3:22 am
TTABlogger comment: Opposer Paisley Park owns rights in the name, image and likeness of Prince Rogers Nelson (the musical artist commonly known as “Prince”), Opposer NPG owns a registrations for the mark PURPLE RAIN, and the two opposers jointly use PURPLE RAIN in licensing and merchandising, Text Copyright John L. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:16 am
The rulemaking must follow the detailed and time-consuming steps to develop a supporting record required by Section 18 (b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (codified at 15 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
The property to be seized, according to the warrant, includes: Any physical documents with classification markings, including any boxes and containers in which such documents are stored, as well as any other containers that might be collectively stored or found together with the aforementioned boxes, even if those boxes themselves were not marked as classified. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Helms (2000) stands as a significant development in the Court’s views.7 Any program that excludes religious schools or entities from public benefits shows a marked absence of neutrality between religious and secular spheres. [read post]
