Search for: "Mark C. Rogers" Results 21 - 40 of 489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But, caveat, compare Booking.com where the Court seems to think that TM has no normative components, it’s all empirical about what is functioning as a mark: the limit case is when TM owners convince 15% of consumers that any reference to them at all requires permission and so there’s at least a 43(a) violation in any unauthorized reference—the Court seemed unwilling to deal with that scenario, which fits the facts of a number of the Rogers cases it distinguished… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Rather, the Court relied on case-law showing that where the use of a mark is “at least in part” for the purposes of source identification, Rogers has no proper role, even if the defendant is also “making an expressive comment” by way of its use. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 5:39 am by Neil Wilkof
The CJEU looked into the relationship between trade marks and mathematical shapes in the Gömböc case (C-237/19). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am by Eric Goldman
§ 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
This included a calculation by Dr Roger Ball of The University of the West of England of the approximate gain Colston made through the Royal Africa Company [34] to [36]. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm by Josh Blackman
Compare Brief for Professor Roger O'Keefe as Amicus Curiae 11–16 with Brief for Mark B. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:43 am by Eric Goldman
The Rogers test protects the rights of trademark owners by allowing courts to ban certain false or misleading uses of their marks. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Deontology: An action is right if and only if the action is either (a) required by a moral duty, or (b) allowed by a moral permission, and not (c) forbidden by a moral prohibition. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:59 am by Emma Snell
Mark Warner (D-VA), the Democratic head of the Senate intelligence committee who announced the bill, said the bill would tackle a wide range of technology threats. [read post]