Search for: "Mark Fam"
Results 21 - 40
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2022, 1:00 am
In addition to Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] 4 All ER 482, which applied the earlier principles in Re Christ Church Alsager [1999] Fam.142 the Chancellor cited the more recent similar case Re St. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 12:30 am
The illegality came to light when PDAS approached the present incumbent for permission for a stone to mark the interments. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 12:03 pm
Nossa robusta representação no Congresso mostra as forças dos nossos valores: Deus, Pátria, Família e Liberdade. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:44 am
Reburials of human remains disturbed in the same cemetery: In Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 WLR 531, Southwark Consistory Court, which was approved obiter by the Court of Arches In Re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis [1996] Fam 44, Both of these passages were cited by the Court of Arches, without adverse comment, in the second Spitalfields judgment, “and therefore there seems no reason to question its accuracy as a correct expression of the law”. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 8:34 am
Reburials of human remains disturbed in the same cemetery: In Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 WLR 531, Southwark Consistory Court, which was approved obiter by the Court of Arches In Re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis [1996] Fam 44, Both of these passages were cited by the Court of Arches, without adverse comment, in the second Spitalfields judgment, “and therefore there seems no reason to question its accuracy as a correct expression of the law”. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 1:45 am
Reburials of human remains disturbed in the same cemetery: In Re St Mary’s Barnes [1982] 1 WLR 531, Southwark Consistory Court, which was approved obiter by the Court of Arches In Re St Michael and All Angels, Tettenhall Regis [1996] Fam 44, Both of these passages were cited by the Court of Arches, without adverse comment, in the second Spitalfields judgment, “and therefore there seems no reason to question its accuracy as a correct expression of the law”. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 1:30 am
The principles for exhumation and reburial had been set out by the Registrar, citing two lead judgments Re Blagdon Cemetery [2002] Fam 299 and Re Christ Church, Alsager [1999] Fam 142. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 12:30 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158 together with the Church’s statutory duties under s35 Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and Care of Churches Measure 2018, the Gau Ch. was satisfied that the proposals, particularly the proposals in relation to raising the floor would result in harm to the significance of the Church as a building of significant architectural or historical interest [13]. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 8:47 am
In 2015 Mostyn J commented, “To say that the law about the ability of the press to report ancillary relief proceedings which they are allowed to observe is a mess would be a serious understatement”: Appleton v Gallagher [2015] EWHC 2689 (Fam); [2016] EMLR 3, at [6]. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 12:30 am
The judgment continued: “Such were the Burges font in Re St Peter’s, Draycott, [2009] Fam 93; the Oldrid Scott chancel screen in Duffield; and the Flemish armet in In re St Lawrence, Wootton [2014] Arches Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:17 am
THEY GOT JIMMY... pic.twitter.com/7qgrTnVqlW— Nexat 💣 Onion Fam (@NexatG) August 5, 2022 I have no idea what got the algorithm to identify "No. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:05 am
Judgments on three such cases have become available in July 2022, each of which demonstrates a different aspect which has been considered by the diocesan chancellor: Re St Mark Ocker Hill Tipton [2022] ECC Lic 4, Re St Mark Ocker Hill Tipton [2022] ECC Lic 5, and Re St Mary Magdalene Bolney [2022] ECC Chi 4. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:00 am
In March 2015 we posted Reservation of burial space, which considered Re All Saints Heathfield [2013] Chichester Const Ct, Mark Hill Ch. where there were only “four or five” spaces remaining and Re St. [read post]
3 May 2022, 12:45 am
Furthermore, the plots were to be physically and discreetly marked on the ground in a manner to be approved by the Incumbent or Minister in charge and the Parochial Church Council. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:00 am
Alkmund, Duffield [2013] Fam 158. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” Knight Institute, slip op. at 10-11.[2] The State Department redacted various version of FAM 302.6, entitled “Ineligibilities Based on Terrorism Related Grounds. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm
The Transparency Project has published a summary of Re B, R & G (a Child) [2022] EWHC 320 (Fam), in which the local authority was applying for reporting restrictions for the trial of G and E’s parents, who were charged with the murder of E. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 7:34 pm
It also marked the last year of that union. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 10:41 am
Another excerpt from the First Amendment section of my Social Media as Common Carriers? [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Kate Germano, author of "Fight Like a Girl"; and Mark Mitchell, former acting assistant defense secretary for special operations and low-intensity conflict. [read post]
