Search for: "Mark Long v . US"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,242
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2014, 6:23 pm
For the Second Circuit, using a competitor’s mark as a mark is not the same as use of a mark in commerce. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 10:00 pm
‚¬J & J Snack Foods Corp. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 2:46 pm
’” [Id., at p. 9 (quoting Gonzales v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
Moreover, a famous mark "casts a long shadow which competitors must avoid. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:04 pm
The proposed legislation threatens to destroy this vital foundation by permitting for the first time in Canada, the right of anyone to register a trade mark without first having used the trade mark anywhere, and for a long shopping list of goods and services that have no rational connection with the goods or services the registrant is interested in or is capable of selling in Canada. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
A group of people has started to file applications of US trade marks, including some very famous ones. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:48 pm
In a decision rendered earlier this year, Ontario Dental Assistants Association v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:02 am
Local use of the mark since 1979;2. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 10:44 am
The BMW "Roundel"Spare parts and intellectual property have a long and complicated history, particularly as far as the car industry is concerned. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:15 am
It will mark the first time since the Court’s 1952 ruling in Steele v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
” The mark was also used on letterheads. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Supermac’s applied to cancel McDonald’s EUTM for BIG MAC which has long passed its initial five-year use grace period. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 2:33 pm
In Duramax Marine, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
In Couture, the Federal Circuit found § 1127 to be clear on its face, and reflective of long established case law, such as United Drug Co. v Theodore Rectanus, a 1918 Supreme Court case known by every U.S. trade mark law student. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:01 am
McDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 6:40 am
The CAFC has ruled that, although the Trademark Act refers to "abandonment," the allegation that a mark was never used "pleads the necessary non use for abandonment," so long as the period of nonuse is at least three years or, if less that three years, is accompanied by a lack of intent to resume or commence use. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 2:58 pm
See Torres v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:05 am
In Verizon New York, Inc. v. [read post]
