Search for: "Mark T. Morton"
Results 21 - 40
of 193
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 7:30 am
” – Is this partly why nonprofit boards aren’t recruiting Millennials & Gen Z? [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Papa I don’t want to marry Allan for some time, but I can get all he has, so what use is there in me marring him. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 7:32 am
(I've italicized the language rather than put it in quotation marks because I've edited the transcript to make it more readable, but I haven't changed the substance.)Is that right? [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:59 am
For instance, Fiona Scott Morton, Steven Salop, and David Dinielli write that: It is an appropriate expression of democracy for Congress to enact pro-competitive statutes to maintain the vibrancy of the online economy and allow for continued innovation that benefits non-platform businesses as well as end users. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
In contrast to his mentor, Morton Keller, whose America’s Three Regimes: A New Political History (2007) positioned the New Deal as a watershed in American public life, Novak charts continuities between the New Deal “administrative state” and the regulatory regime that emerged in the period between 1866 and 1932. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Morton’s and Others Brace as Activists Offer Cash for SCOTUS Sightings Yahoo News – Emily Heil and Tim Carman (Washington Post) | Published: 7/11/2022 The Washington, D.C. location of Morton’s the Steakhouse is the first known restaurant in the city to be dragged into the protests over the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:36 am
A symbol can be arbitrary/fanciful and still ornamental b/c we don’t consider it to be a mark. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 1:49 pm
These rulings have led other commentators, including myself, to become more pessimistic (see also analyses by Billy Binion and Mark Joseph Stern). [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:59 am
§1915(a)(3), (b)(iii), as failing to satisfy the rational-basis standard of Morton v. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:26 am
" The Board was not persuaded: "[T]he patent claims features of the seat, back, and legs found in the proposed mark, and claims the manner of placement of these features on the spine, as found in the preferred embodiment chair, just as they appear in the proposed mark. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Morton has not been charged and denies wrongdoing. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
"For the sake of completeness, the Board went on to consider the remaining Morton-Norwich factors. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:00 am
Key Findings Forty-five states and the District of Columbia collect statewide sales taxes. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 7:20 am
In fact, the CAFC in Morton-Norwich says (in dictum) that the design patent is presumptive evidence that the design is not functional. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 3:56 am
What if its a published application that hasn't been examined yet? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:24 am
These are due to faulty road design, inadequate road maintenance, poor planning for increased traffic and pedestrians, lack of traffic calming measures, crazy configurations that have befuddled highway road designers, or an omission of signage or road markings that only causes confusion. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:30 am
(h/t: Legal Theory Blog)-- Karen Tani [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 3:10 am
The refusal under Section 2(e)(5) was accordingly reversed.Acquired Distinctiveness: The Board pointed out that Applicant had a high burden to overcome to show that the proposed mark had acquired distinctiveness: “[T]he proposed product package configuration mark, on its face, does not appear to be particularly unique inasmuch as it is a cylindrically-shaped container, making it less likely to be perceived as a source indicator. [read post]
