Search for: "Markel American Insurance Company" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2011, 10:16 am by Brandon D'Agostino
There are situations, though, where the existence of data (as opposed to its content) is central to the matter – when companies suspect employees of stealing proprietary information or when employees leave a company under suspicious circumstances. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:30 pm by Nexsen Pruet
Markel American Insurance Company, 242 F.R.D. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:43 am
The Jones' brought an additional claim against their insurer, the Markel American Insurance Company, and were awarded $100,000 in (additional) penalties as well as $10,000 in attorneys' fees. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Conservative columnist Walter Olson called it "a stinging rebuke to a small army of progressive American academics, journalists, foundation grantmakers, and others who've promoted the case for years. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Wind and water are constant concerns of the buccaneer -- and of insurance companies, as Ted Frank pointed out at Point of Law.com:  "Are Insurance Companies Getting Hosed in the Wind vs. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 12:01 am
Wind and water are constant concerns of the buccaneer -- and of insurance companies, as Ted Frank pointed out at Point of Law.com:  "Are Insurance Companies Getting Hosed in the Wind vs. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 6:07 am
., posted on The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, December 2007: Much has been written about a company’s obligation to preserve, produce, and even restore electronically stored information (”ESI”), but much less has been written about the ways in which ESI can actually be used as evidence to prove one’s case or [...] [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:16 pm
Markel American Insurance Co ., 241 F.R.D. 534 (D. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 9:00 am
Markel American Insurance Company, is actually terrific and I recommend it to anyone interested in electronic discovery and the rules of evidence. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:27 am by Chellis Neal Gonzalez
Filed May 4, 2007--Opinion by Judge Paul GrimmIn an action brought to enforce a private arbitrator’s award for damage to a yacht, the court determined that the motion by the boat owners was properly considered as a motion to modify the award under the Federal Arbitration Act, while the motion by the insurance company sought to enforce the award rather than have it increased as requested by the boat owners. [read post]