Search for: "Marks v. Marks" Results 21 - 40 of 34,288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
Senado Federal / CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) Jane Lambert Chancery Division (Daniel Alexander QC) Planetart LLC and another v Photobox Ltd and another[2020] EWHC 713 (Ch) (25 March 2020) This was an action for trade mark infringement. passing off and invalidation of one of the defendant's trade marks. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:32 am by Larry Munn
  In The Ministry of Commerce and Industry of the Republic of Cyprus v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 2:06 pm by James Yang
However, in The Forest Group Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 5:12 am
("PCCW") sued the well-known group of broadcasting and telecommunications companies that operate under the Sky sign for infringement of Starbruck (HK) Ltd's Community trade mark [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:26 pm
In 32Red Plc v WHG (International) Ltd and Others [2012] EWCA Civ 19 (24 Jan 2012) the Court of Appeal allowed a cross appeal by the claimant, 32Red Ltd. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:27 am by The Docket Navigator
In the months following the Federal Circuit's decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 7:44 am by Matt Osenga
Yesterday, the Federal Circuit affirmed the grant of summary judgment of no liability for false marking in Pequignot v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 12:21 pm by Rick Boyd
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in The Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 1:42 pm by Peter Groves
I've done it myself, usually the other way round - applying for a UK trade mark so the owner of an earlier EU trade mark wouldn't notice. [read post]
28 May 2009, 3:52 am
In Daimler AG v Sany Group Company Ltd [2009] EWHC 1003 (Ch) (14 May 2009) the registered proprietor of the following marks sought injunctions and other relief against Sany Group Co. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:21 am by Jeremy Telman
The story seems much creepier than the classic icehouse case, Mitchill v. [read post]