Search for: "Marks v. Marks"
Results 21 - 40
of 34,288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 4:46 am
Laird v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 3:39 am
DoorDash, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 2:48 am
The Board considered the absolute grounds for refusal and decided to remand the contested mark to the examiner to assess the distinctive character of the mark. [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 8:17 am
curid=97243730 Jane LambertSupreme Court (Lords Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Leggatt, Stephens and Richards) Lifestyle Equities CV and another v Ahmed and Another [2024] UKSC 17 (15 May 2024 [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 6:10 am
Trump Trials A Manhattan Jury Has Placed a Question Mark on the Trump Presidency by Adam Klasfeld (@KlasfeldReports) and Norman L. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 7:42 am
The Federal Court has issued a landmark decision (Blacklock’s Reports v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 3:40 am
Video below: Thousands take part in LGBTQ+ Pride march in Jerusalem Since Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:30 pm
Delaware marks 70th anniversary of its role in landmark Brown v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 8:20 am
Continue reading The post NY v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 4:29 am
The two earlier decisions that the GC refers to rather served to explain why the weakness of the earlier marks did not avoid confusion (the CJEU’s decision in case C‑235/05 P on FLEX v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 3:06 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 7:21 am
This decision marks a significant moment in employment law, particularly regarding health mandates for remote workers. [read post]
30 May 2024, 6:41 am
Marks of the U.S. [read post]
“The strange case of Alito v. Alito; Alito-gate: The justice, his wife, her flags and their ethics.”
29 May 2024, 6:55 pm
“The strange case of Alito v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
The penalty of dismissal is not "so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness" (Matter of Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32, 38 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
A plaintiff may demonstrate that a special relationship exists by showing, among other things, that the municipality "voluntarily assume[d] a duty that generate[d] justifiable reliance by the person who benefits from the duty," or that "the municipality assume[d] positive direction and control in the face of a known, blatant and dangerous safety violation" (Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d at 820 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Thomas… [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
A plaintiff may demonstrate that a special relationship exists by showing, among other things, that the municipality "voluntarily assume[d] a duty that generate[d] justifiable reliance by the person who benefits from the duty," or that "the municipality assume[d] positive direction and control in the face of a known, blatant and dangerous safety violation" (Wilson v New York City Bd. of Educ., 167 AD3d at 820 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Thomas… [read post]
28 May 2024, 3:24 am
” TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
