Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,593
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
This notice is not expedient enough to provide the United States with sufficient time to protect its interests, and is not directed to the Department of Justice—the agency responsible for representing the United States’ interests in a false marking suit. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:00 pm
EXTRADITION TREATY BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE PRINCIPALITY OF LIECHTENSTEIN The United States of America and the Principality of Liechtenstein, animated by the desire to promote the cause of justice, have agreed to conclude a treaty concerning the extradition of fugitives from justice between the two States and have appointed the following plenipotentiaries for this purpose: The President of the United… [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 2:55 am
A. v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
On Jan. 17, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S, v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am
The making or the utterance, circulation or fraudulent use of counterfeit money or counterfeit seals, stamps, dies and marks of the government or public authority. 22. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:16 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:02 am
United States. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Justice Kennedy’s opinion reads much like his opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:58 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:16 am
” In arguing that venue may not lie in D.C., Van Grack and Chervak rely on United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
On Friday, the Justice Department filed a particularly interesting brief in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 7:18 pm
Military Commissions Chief Prosecutor Mark Martins released a statement following the completion of yesterday’s hearing in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:39 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
Department of Justice so that the department (who is charged with enforcing the law) could express its views on the constitutionality of the false marking statute. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 6:49 am
A Justice Department spokesperson declined comment. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
Much of the argument focused on precisely this question, causing the justices to explore the meaning of the word "adjacent," as the Court previously upheld the EPA and Army Corps' authority over wetlands adjacent to navigable waters in United States v. [read post]
