Search for: "Marriage of Cole"
Results 21 - 40
of 159
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2007, 9:36 am
And apparently, a same sex marriage will be fine. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 2:28 pm
As this graph provided by the Heritage Foundation shows, in the mid-Fifties, approximately 19% of black children were born outside marriage, or roughly one in five. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
Michael Cole raises similar concerns at HRC Back Story. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 4:48 am
The suit asserts that California Proposition 8, which bans same-sex marriage, violates the constitution. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 10:15 am
Cole, a unanimous decision from the Arkansas Supreme Court, struck down the law. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 11:14 am
He reminded the court that in its decision affirming the right to same-sex marriage, the majority acknowledged that “good and decent people” may object to same-sex marriage on religious grounds. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:30 am
Cole, Steven I. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:28 am
Cole v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 7:48 am
The following is a link to the Court’s Decision: DHS v Cole Opinion. [read post]
Creating Family (Law): Commentary on Eskridge and Riano’s Marriage Equality: From Outlaws to In-Laws
1 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Same-sex couples, of course, were excluded from marriage. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting Appellate Court of Illinois decision, Cole v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:37 pm
The Child Support Provision Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the marriage contract required the ex-husband (David) to pay child support to the ex-wife (Christine) for support of the two children (Tristyn and Cole). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 12:37 pm
The Child Support Provision Paragraphs 10 and 11 of the marriage contract required the ex-husband (David) to pay child support to the ex-wife (Christine) for support of the two children (Tristyn and Cole). [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:37 am
Based on an ACLU press advisory issued this morning by Matt Coles, Director of their LGBT Rights Project, which litigated the case, the court majority used the thoroughly disreputable (my description, not Matt's) and totally specious (ditto) rationale that this is a rational basis, not strict scrutiny case, and that the state could rationally decide to extend marriage only to different-sex couples because it was necessary to channel their procreative activities. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 12:00 am
LHB readers will want to check out David Cole's review of From the Closet to the Altar: Courts, Backlash, and the Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage (Oxford University Press, 2012), by Michael J. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
That’s right, it seems to me, if we can all agree that the degendered marriages the states afford people today are the marriages to which they have a protected constitutional right; if in degendering the marriage, the states did not violate the due process clause. [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:48 am
To translate: it's apparently been the common wisdom among gay rights advocates that premature federal constitutional litigation on gay marriage could be harmful to that cause. [read post]
7 Mar 2006, 10:56 am
Such marriages are not just artifacts of the closeted 1950's. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 3:48 pm
Philip Gordon comments on social media checks by employers "coming of age", Ted Lewkowicz continues his series on the New York same-sex marriage law and Stuart Carpey explains why he had to turn down good work. [read post]
19 May 2011, 4:53 pm
Today, Daniel Clement has a very interesting post on same sex marriage and its impact on the New York economy. [read post]
