Search for: "Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc."
Results 21 - 33
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2011, 5:23 am
” A good example of an applicant with a famous name but untested and descriptive trademark and no proof of “substantial media attention” prior to the registration of the domain name is Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:09 am
., vice president, Healthy Living, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:15 am
This was particularly highlighted in Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 12:09 pm
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 2:59 am
Or, perhaps, success comes by trolling new trademark applications for potential winning combinations of words which the applicant has neglected first to register as a domain name, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 11:39 am
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [duncanbucknell.com]GlobalIP Think Tank top five's: (IP Think Tank),More on IP law in the virtual world: (VirtualLaw), Interesting times for the Citi brand: (IAM), Velcro has won control of the domain name velcro.biz: (OUT-LAW), The Economic Value of Patent 'Trolls': (IP Think Tank),Industry Trilateral group and the 'global patent application' project: (PatentDocs), Update on the BitTorrent war -… [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., posted on December 29, 2008), the court found that the action was not a “class action” within the meaning of CAFA, and so CAFA did not provide a basis for jurisdiction. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
Prior to her work with meQuilibrium, Jan Bruce was CEO at Body+Soul Magazine, the category leader in wellness and sustainability, which was acquired by Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:22 am
” In a subsequent decision by the Delaware Supreme Court in 2004, the plaintiffs argued in another shareholder derivative action that three board members were not independent because of their close ties with Martha Stewart. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 2:49 pm
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Ethan Allen Retail, Inc., No. 08-10005 (11th Cir. [read post]
