Search for: "Martinez v. Department of Justice"
Results 21 - 40
of 201
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
LIV Golf and seven of its golfers have sued the PGA Tour, saying it violated antitrust laws, allegations the Justice Department is also reportedly probing. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:04 am
California Court Clarifies Position on Websites and the ADA In a recent case, Martinez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 8:25 am
On August 1, 2022, the California Court of Appeals opinion in Martinez v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 7:25 am
Brown v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Justice Department Details Threats Against Election Workers Associated Press News – Marina Villeneuve | Published: 8/3/2022 The U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Several former senior Justice Department officials testified about a bizarre effort by Clark to volunteer himself and the department as advocates for Trump’s bogus claims of massive voter fraud during the election. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm
If administrative oversight mechanisms are to provide any kind of justice, the Department of Homeland Security, CBP’s parent agency, must urgently make several changes. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 8:04 am
June 16, 2022Vidal-Martinez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
U.S. law requires anyone who lobbies on behalf of other governments to be registered with the Justice Department. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:58 pm
Arteaga-Martinez In Johnson v. [read post]
28 May 2022, 2:25 pm
First, it’s ridiculous to call the Castle Rock v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 8:56 am
Martinez reasoned that Dickerson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 8:30 am
The first, Biden v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 2:24 pm
Arteaga-Martinez At issue in the first case, Johnson v. [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 10:26 am
Instead, the Department of Justice argues that no hearings are required here because immigrants get paper “file reviews,” done solely by ICE — the jailer. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
Ramirez: The justice will answer the following: “Whether application of the equitable rule the Supreme Court announced in Martinez v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Martinez, 561 U.S. 661, 680 (2010). [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 12:30 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court released its decision in Brownback v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Second Department To find a marital contract unconscionable, two elements must be shown: procedural unconscionability, and substantive unconscionability In Cilento v Cilento, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2020 WL 4661442, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
