Search for: "Martinez v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2014, 1:00 pm
Superior Court (Allstate Ins. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Superior Court (Hohnbaum). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:41 am
The Court next considered whether application of Martinez v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
Even more so given that the overwhelming majority of criminal cases end with plea bargains.The California Supreme Court decides the issue. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 1:37 pm
(Martinez v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:19 pm
Turning from the common law “control” test, the appellate court then considered the California Supreme Court’s discussion of “employ” as set forth in Martinez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 1:48 pm
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:09 am
Superior Court (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 523, 538 (alter ego doctrine)).Zoran Corp. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:12 am
Superior Court, 2011 Cal. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
Superior Court of Los Angeles. [read post]
21 May 2007, 7:45 am
But a Marion Superior Court judge denied those requests. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
See Schnabel v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
Martinez, 230 Cal. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 11:26 am
In Lambert v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 1:25 pm
” See Martinez v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 9:26 am
Superior Court. [read post]
1 May 2018, 10:44 am
At issue in Dynamex was the scope of Martinez v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
The district court recognized that “no binding decision ha[d] addressed the standard applicable to determining whether a franchisor is an employer of a franchisee,” and “in the absence of controlling authority” it applied the standard from Martinez v Combs, with the gloss of Patterson v Domino’s Pizza, LLC . [read post]
