Search for: "Martinez-Hernandez v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
County of Monroe and Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Martinez, by Gloria Valencia-WeberChallenging the Narrative of Conquest: The Story of Lyng v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:03 am
The case is State v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 10:19 pm
Víctor M. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court decided Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:21 am
Tuesday's Supreme Court ruling in Martinez v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Rodriguez, Mayra Martinez Suarez, Laura Diaz, Juan Prieto, Flavia Perez, Jose Antonio Diaz, and Johny Hernandez. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Rodriguez, Mayra Martinez Suarez, Laura Diaz, Juan Prieto, Flavia Perez, Jose Antonio Diaz, and Johny Hernandez. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Joel Martinez Hernandez, Case No. 11-20446-Cr-Moreno; and United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:49 am
Joel Martinez Hernandez, Case No. 11-20446-Cr-Moreno; and United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 11:50 am
Campbell, Judge.Representing Appellant: Julie Hernandez and Rick Martinez of Legal Aid of Wyoming, Inc., Cheyenne, Wyoming; Wendy S. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 8:40 am
James DeAnda, an attorney with the Hernandez v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:18 am
Combs.The trial court in Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Defendant also fails to attach a copy of its own answer, but does not state that its motion is one for pre-answer dismissal. [read post]
