Search for: "Marvin Williams v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 84
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2018, 2:59 pm
In the aftermath of decision in ‘Blurred Lines’, where the Court had ruled against Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke for infringing copyright in Marvin Gaye's "Got to Give It Up" and an increasing number of actions against songs topping music charts from rightholders owning rights in songs created in the past for taking parts of their songs, some musicians believe that the decision constitutes a threat to creativity. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:42 am
See Williams v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 10:42 am
See Williams v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:46 am
" New York Times v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:07 pm
On June 27, the president nominated William J. [read post]
4 May 2017, 6:48 am
”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
The most visible perhaps is the recent case of Williams v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
District Judge Marvin Frankel dismissed that complaint. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
“Blurred Lines” Can Make Things Expensive As you might recall, Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke sued the Gaye estate, seeking declaratory judgment that they did not copy Marvin Gaye’s song “Got to Give it Up” with their 2013 “Blurred Lines” single. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:41 pm
Shelly Sterling, the NBA, V. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
Civ. 1ère, No. 13-23566.March was all about the 'Blurred Lines' in copyright and a US Jury's decision to award $7.3 million to the Estate of Marvin Gaye on the basis that Pharrell Williams and Robin Thicke’s soul-inspired pop song "Blurred Lines" too closely mirrored Gaye’s 1977 single "Got to Give It Up". [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:00 am
nolanguage=en+-+t-623373. [9] 56th Miller Lecture: Internet Revolutionized Creativity, Changing IP Law, Georgia State University (Sep. 17, 2015), http://law.gsu.edu/2015/09/17/56th-miller-lecture/. [10] Williams v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[v] Justice Anthony M. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 9:48 am
Panel V. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:43 pm
Thicke Just days before SXSW, a court awarded $7.3 million to the family of Marvin Gaye as the result of the contentious and highly publicized Gaye v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
”And with Marvin Gaye's children now musing what other songs may have been 'copied' from their father's work (the last I heard, it was Pharrell Williams in the firing line again for his smash hit 'Happy', which Nona Gaye says is a copy of Hayes 1966 song 'Ain’t That Peculiar') an appeal in the Blurred Lines case has been formally announced. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 11:41 am
Swirsky v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
United States. [read post]
