Search for: "Massachusetts General Life v. Sellers" Results 21 - 28 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  Under the UCL, “[d]amages cannot be recovered, and plaintiffs are generally limited to injunctive relief and restitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
In an effort to keep things straight as related to the declarations, we’ll call that one: “Why Everyone Should Love MERS More Than Life Itself… The Sequel. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 7:23 pm by Adam Levitin
The complaint only alleges chain of title problems based on Kemp v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:24 am by Mandelman
Investors, including New York Life, TIAA-CREFF, a French banking subsidiary that I’ve never heard of, and other deep pockets, institutional investors, bought mortgage-backed securities, and were told they were safe, solid and secure, but instead they were, well… shoddy and shitty. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 9:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Katz generally represents celebrities; involved in Adderly v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Murphy, No. 06-2292 The text of the Massachusetts SDP statute, as interpreted by state courts, does not on its face violate the due process protections heretofore afforded sexually dangerous persons subject to civil commitment. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
One could consider this a paradox, or strange, or acclimatization to what is in this life, or defense of an unfortunate status quo. [read post]