Search for: "Mata v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 107
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2023, 3:17 pm
We’ve missed a few things while I was gone:The judge in the Mata v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:43 pm
Cite: Mata v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
Federal Court Sanctions Lawyers for ChatGPT UseRoberto Mata, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 4:44 am
Securities Industry Commentator: A legal, regulatory, and compliance feed curated by veteran Wall Street lawyer Bill Singer https://www.rrbdlaw.com/7103/securities-industry-commentator/ Federal Court Sanctions Lawyers for ChatGPT UseRoberto Mata, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:07 am
See Mata v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 7:09 am
Among them was Varghese v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
"] A month ago, I wrote about Judge Kevin Castel (S.D.N.Y.)'s May 4 order in Mata v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:19 pm
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] A Lawyer's Filing "Is Replete with Citations to Non-Existent Cases"—Thanks, ChatGPT?
26 May 2023, 10:46 pm
.)'s May 4 order in Mata v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:28 pm
In Mata-Cabello v . [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 2:03 am
Maxim Healthcare Staffing Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:33 pm
In Mata v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:24 pm
Brennan, Reyes Mata v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
En cuanto a esto, la opinión concurrente de la Juez Rodríguez Rodríguez, a la que se une la Juez Fiol Mata en Aponte Hernández v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 12:30 pm
SpeechNow.org v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:24 am
Kai-chieh Chan, Álvarez y Marín Corporación and Others v. [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 9:39 pm
In Bhattacharjee v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 6:38 am
Breakstone The recent Supreme Judicial Court decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 am
HB 95, in my opinion, more clearly states the intent of the legislature, although the definition of “actual cost” in SB 31 would be helpful in preparing and arguing future motions should this become law. [read post]