Search for: "Material Transportation, Inc"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
It presents the question whether, in prosecuting a woman accused of smuggling drugs into the United States, the government can introduce expert testimony that most couriers know they are carrying drugs and that drug-trafficking organizations do not typically entrust large quantities of drugs to unwitting transporters. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 6:53 am
Cargill, involving whether bump stocks are “machineguns” and thus generally prohibited, and Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
"That the ramp was intended for the transport of materials, and was not a substitute for a ladder or scaffold, was of “no moment,” as the operative consideration was whether “the ramp covered a significant elevation differential,” and since it did so here, the AD1 agreed that, absent the appropriate protections, liability attached.Looks like this case just got a bit more elevated …# # #DECISIONL. v Whitestar Consulting & Contr., Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:22 am
Indiana and Illinois are transportation hubs where goods and freight are moved and distributed throughout the country via our “Crossroads of America. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am
AOL Time Warner, Inc., 261 F. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
Copper Liquor, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 9:06 am
Additionally, there will be mandatory updates to Zipcar’s employee training materials about NHTSA compliance obligations. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 8:59 am
(Van Dyne Parmet, Jitka), Lexis Medical Treatment—Utilization Review—Change in Material Facts—WCAB, denying reconsideration, held that 8 Cal. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:26 pm
In extreme circumstances, contractors may face questions of whether to continue performance in the face of potentially material government failures to pay. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Given FDR’s antipathy to competition, had the Supreme Court not declared the NIRA unconstitutional in 1935, U.S. antitrust might have been extinguished as a result of FDR’s all-time record-setting dozen years in office. 1937-1943: Robert Jackson and Thurman Arnold – An Antitrust Revival Instead, antitrust (including the FTC) was rescued, revived, and launched into a highly aggressive phase by unpredictable developments: in 1937, FDR was persuaded to reverse course and support… [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 6:51 pm
The Senior Research and Policy Analyst supports our programmatic focus on electrification of the transportation, building, and industrial sectors by providing strategic and technical assistance. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
Flagship Marine Servs., Inc., 190 F.3d 26, 31–32 (2d Cir. 1999) (citing N.Y. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:47 am
Ozark Motor Lines transported a packed Ozark trailer from Restoration Hardware to Baton Rouge. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: selective prosecution under § 1983, January 6 sentencings, and more.
23 Aug 2023, 7:55 pm
Frederick Douglass Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 8:58 am
Also in Texas, winter storm Uri in 2021 adversely impacted millions of people with disabilities, particularly those dependent on home medical devices, leaving them without heat or electricity and poor access to water, transportation, health care, and emergency services. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
SODRAC 2003 Inc., 2015 SCC 57 (CanLII), [2015] 3 SCR 615, <https://canlii.ca/t/gm8b0> namely that: [113] I find that licences fixed by the Board do not have mandatory binding force over a user; the Board has the statutory authority to fix the terms of licences pursuant to s. 70.2, but a user retains the ability to decide whether to become a licensee and operate pursuant to that licence, or to decline. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:57 am
Operations, Inc., Serial No. 90559208 (July 24, 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 2:25 am
In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, the Supreme Court held that a doctor “is under a duty to take reasonable care to ensure that the patient is aware of any material risks involved in any recommended treatment, and of any reasonable alternative or variant treatments. [read post]
