Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Guzman"
Results 21 - 36
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
Rogelio Casados and Rafaela Casados, No. 10-0523 (Guzman, J.) [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:52 am
Justice Eva Guzman delivered a dissenting opinion, in which Justice David Medina and Justice Willett joined. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm
Had Texas partnership statutes not adopted that view of partnerships, this case might have turned out differently. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:52 pm
Had Texas partnership statutes not adopted that view of partnerships, this case might have turned out differently. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:50 am
Having concluded that this statutory phrase was ambiguous, the six Justices in the majority opinion (written by Justice Guzman) chose to defer to the agency’s own interpretation rather than looking for other aids to statutory construction.1 The Court reiterated that Texas has not adopted the federal model for agency deference but instead follows its own test: We have long held that an agency’s interpretation of a statute it is charged with enforcing is entitled to… [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:27 pm
In the new opinions, neither Justice Guzman nor Justice Lehrmann is participating. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:18 pm
That is perhaps everything that matters to the litigants. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
” The state has never adopted the Third Restatement §2, although its supreme Court has cited parts of §2 with approval. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:43 pm
Jun. 25, 2009)(Guzman)(consolidation of an interlocutory appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus, challenge to district court'sorder compelling arbitration and staying proceedings in the trial court fails)(unconscionabiltiy argumentrejected re arbitration of attorney-client disputes)(public policy arguments overruled) DISMISSED: Opinion by Justice Eva Guzman Panel members: Justices Guzman, Mirabal and Boyce14-08-00527-CV Abdel Hakim Labidi, M.D. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:29 pm
A third interesting challenge to our conceptualization of hard and soft law as antagonists comes from Margaret de Guzman. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 2:52 pm
" "[I]f a defendant intended ... to sexually assault a person, it does not matter that the intended victim was fictional or did not actually exist," Judge James Casebolt wrote. ..Source.. ==================================== Colorado Court of Appeals -- November 12, 2009 No. 07CA2393. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 2:03 pm
").Whether a party has ratified a contract may be determined as a matter of law if the evidence is not controverted or is incontrovertible. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 2:59 pm
One may ask – and I hope to get your thoughts specifically on this matter – whether this is the right question. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 3:18 am
Jan. 15, 2008) (Guzman, J.).Judge Guzman adopted Magistrate Judge Cole’s Report and Reconsideration in full, holding defendants in contempt for violating the Court’s injunctions requiring that defendants return various customer information taken from plaintiff, defendant’s former employer – click here for more on the prior opinions in the Blog’s archives. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 4:04 am
Sep. 13, 2007) (Guzman, J.).Judge Guzman conducted a Fed. [read post]
24 Jan 2006, 3:46 am
Other systems, such as the Austrian, locate the action within the law of property, and do so through adoption of the classic Roman law actio negatoria. [read post]
