Search for: "Matter of Applebaum"
Results 21 - 40
of 96
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2018, 2:00 am
This matter arose out of a property damage case from a burst water pipe. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 10:30 pm
The court found that, as of the date of its decision in this case, the law of Pennsylvania and regular use exclusion was settled and, as such, this issue did not constitute a reason in support of remanding the matter to the state court. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
§ 1447(c), which provides that “If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, the case shall be remanded. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
Applebaum’s protagonists, by contrast, have enjoyed no such luck. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 1:00 am
This case was found on Attorney Applebaum excellent Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 5:00 am
Please be sure to check out Attorney Applebaum’s excellent Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
Check out Attorney Applebaum's blog HERE. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
” Given that the court found that any effort to amend their Complaint would be futile, the Complaint in this matter was dismissed with prejudice by the court. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
The Plaintiff had demanded the full $200,000.00 UIM policy limits and filed suit when her demand was not met.During the course of the matter, the carrier increased its offer to $50,000.00. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Please remember to check out Attorney Applebaum’s excellent and Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
Attorney Applebaum is also the writer of the excellent Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Lee Applebaum, writer of the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law Blog and member of the Philadelphia law firm of Fineman Krekstein & Harris, for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
” The court stated that, as a matter of law, there is no basis to support a claim against the claims representative because only the carrier may be held liable under the claims presented. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
The Court's Order can be viewed HERE.In a related decison in the same matter issued by the court five days after this one, the Court sua sponte dismissed the Plaintiff's UM/UIM case where the record confirmed that the subject policy only had $50,000 in limits, which amount of potential damages was less than the $75,000 amount necessary for federal court subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
Judge Caputo did otherwise reaffirm that §8371 does not cover alleged bad faith in soliciting a policy and, therefore, did dismiss that claim in this matter. [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the court found that the Plaintiff in this matter was found not to have any standing to sue the tortfeasor’s carrier for bad faith. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:06 am
The notion that a professional wordsmith can’t convey the difference between a trial and a guilty plea without “confusing the matter” is sheer lunacy. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Please be sure to check out Attorney Applebaum’s excellent blog entitled the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 3:00 am
As such, the statutory bad faith claim was found to be barred in this matter as well.The court also rejected the Plaintiff’s efforts to assert a common law bad faith claim that would allegedly be subject to a four (4) year contract statute of limitations. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
I send thanks to Attorney Lee Applebaum of the Philadelphia law firm of Fineman Krekstein & Harris and the writer of the Pennsylvania and New Jersey Insurance Bad Faith Case Law blog. [read post]
