Search for: "Matter of Arnold v Arnold" Results 21 - 40 of 879
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2015, 5:01 am by Lauren Wood, Olswang LLP
      [1] Arnold v Britton & Ors [2013] EWCA Civ 902 (22 July 2013), para 45 [2] Ibid, para 50 [3] Ibid, para 57 [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
 This term has been no different, but my, how they have ended in a dramatic fashion with....drum roll please...a reference to the CJEU from Mr Justice Arnold on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896.The problem and the questions to be referred What do you do if your patent is about to expire, but despite notice that Member States have agreed to grant your marketing authorization (MA) under the decentralized… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 7:35 am
 In the past three months, Mr Justice Arnold has decided three SPC cases - Teva v Gilead [2017] EWHC 13, Abraxis v Comptroller General of Patents [2017] EWHC 14 and, last week, Teva v MSD [2017] EWHC 539. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:20 am
 In December 2012, just before Christmas, and just before this Kat rejoined the blogging team, Arnold J handed down the decision Microsoft Corp v Motorola Mobility LLC [2012] EWHC 3677 (Pat) (21 December 2012). [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
 The second is Mr Justice Arnold, whose detailed and inevitably lengthy pronouncements on matters of IP law have truly earned the adjective 'Arnoldian' a permanent place in our working vocabulary. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Challenging a layoff determinationMatter of Janet Arnold, et al v Erie County Med. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:50 am
“the agency has issued an unambiguously final decision that puts the [individual] on notice that all administrative appeals have been exhausted" [see Matter of Carter v State of N.Y., Exec. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
Arnold J dismissed an allegation of added matter, and that claim 1 of the Patent lacks novelty over International Patent Application No. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
In a judgment delivered on 22 February 2018 in the case of Ali v Channel 5 Broadcast ([2018] EWHC 298 (Ch)) Arnold J ordered Channel 5 to pay £20,000 in damages for misuse of private information to a couple, Shakir Ali and Shahida Aslam, who had fallen into rent arears. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:18 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0083, 2011 MT 23, STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:45 am
The hearing is due to finish on Thursday.The question, as summarized on the Supreme Court's website, is as follows:Whether a new pemetrexed based cancer treatment produced by Actavis UK Limited and others infringes Eli Lilly and Company’s patent and its foreign designations either indirectly under s. 60(2) of the Patents Act 1977 (matter for appeal) or directly under a proper interpretation of Article 69 of the Europe Patent Convention 2000 (matter for cross-appeal). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
When defense counsel attempted to explore the prospective juror's apparent reservations, the court precluded any further inquiry on the matter. [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:19 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is an Absolute Divorce? [read post]
2 May 2018, 11:19 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is an Absolute Divorce? [read post]