Search for: "Matter of Bar v Short"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,842
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2008, 12:40 am
USANA Health Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
But the search of cell phones seized from his car was another matter. [read post]
20 May 2020, 9:01 pm
In New Energy Company Co. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Nothing in the Authority's Employee Benefit Summary, its short term disability policy, or its letter confirming that Claimant's short term disability claim had been denied states that employees are barred from seeking short term disability benefits if they have previously applied for Workers' Compensation, places the rationality of the Authority's determination into question.3. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
Nothing in the Authority's Employee Benefit Summary, its short term disability policy, or its letter confirming that Claimant's short term disability claim had been denied states that employees are barred from seeking short term disability benefits if they have previously applied for Workers' Compensation, places the rationality of the Authority's determination into question.3. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
The "additional matters" were: (1) United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 8:11 am
Themis Bar Review, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 12:13 pm
But that court does not undertake the fact finding and determination of the matter. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:13 pm
Circuit put in place a high bar for their application in Teicher v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 9:10 am
In a devastating passage, the Bar notes that Nifong misread a Supreme Court decision—United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:29 pm
V. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 5:20 pm
Today, the 5th Circuit clarified a procedural hurdle to that tactic in a small category of cases.In Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:42 am
However, “[t]he continuous representation doctrine serves to toll the statute of limitations and render timely an otherwise time-barred cause of action for legal malpractice, but ‘only where there is a mutual understanding of the need for further representation on the specific subject matter underlying the malpractice claim’ ” (King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541, 543 [2018], quoting McCoy v Feinman,… [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
As the Supreme Court observed in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:55 am
In People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:00 am
That said, there has been recent ruling in Lenz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 9:33 am
In the habeas matter of Wilkerson v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
In short, if you have a patent, sue first and act nice later. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
The case – Coalition for Clean Air v. [read post]
